[jannis.von.albedyll]

WCFM Marketplace: Version 3.1.6
WCFM – WooCommerce Frontend Manager: Version 6.2.5

[jannis.von.albedyll]

Sorry, I meant a bug on ‘type’ => ‘checkbox’.

[jannis.von.albedyll]

By the way: following custom-field works perfectly:

function add_allow_invoice($settings_fields_general, $vendor_id){
	if( isset( $settings_fields_general['store_name'] ) ) {
		$allow_invoice = get_user_meta( $vendor_id, 'allow_invoice', true );
		$settings_fields_general['allow_invoice'] = array(
			'label' => __( 'Rechnung erlauben', 'ddwoo' ),
			'type' => 'text',
			'priority' => 50,
			'class' => 'wcfm-text wcfm_ele',
			'label_class' => 'wcfm_title wcfm_ele',
			'value' => $allow_invoice
		);
	}
	return $settings_fields_general;
}

The value gets always updated and is persisted correctly. That’s why I guess it’s a bug on the 'type' => 'text'.

[jannis.von.albedyll]

Other fields of $wcfm_settings_form get updated properly in the add_action. So if I change something about the address for instance, in debugging the new value is submitted.

[jannis.von.albedyll]

$allow_invoice = get_user_meta( $vendor_id, 'allow_invoice', true );
always gives me yes, after I checked the checkbox once.

Even if I UNcheck the box, the code evaluates ‘yes’ (see screenshot attached).

So the connection between the checkbox and the add_action('wcfm_vendor_settings_update', array($this, 'save_custom_vendor_settings'), 16, 2); does not work properly as the code always evaluates ‘yes’ for $wcfm_settings_form['allow_invoice'].

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[jannis.von.albedyll]

Thank you for your answer, but this does not work :(. The behaviour is still the same:

Once I checked the checkbox, $wcfm_settings_form['allow_invoice'] is ALWAYS yes (no matter if I uncheck the box or not).

If I uncheck it and save the settings, I do not enter the else path

else {
		update_user_meta( $vendor_id, 'allow_invoice',  'no' );
	}

Do you have any other idea?

[jannis.von.albedyll]

Is there no one who can help me with that?

[Author]

Posts