Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- JoseParticipant
Hi, you can see in home of forum a search box, up and the right side
Regards,
JoseParticipantHi,
Thanks a lot for your explanation, but can I ask you where we use that ? because with my setting I can’t see where we can see all this info.
Regards,
JoseParticipantHi,
Thanks, now it’s clearer
thank you
JoseParticipantHi,
Thanks, it’s great news
Thank you
June 6, 2019 at 7:40 pm in reply to: Not possible to translate "…. others have reviewed this store" #66280JoseParticipantHi,
Exist in wc-multivendor-marketplace loco translate but in parts
– and
– others have
– reviewed this store
– hasRegards,
JoseParticipantThanks Dominique, but Keymaster can you please have with you feedback ?
WC has a big problem with taxes and shipping together. If I activate the tax (to have the opportunity to return the shipping tax to the vendor), WC requires that you enter the shipping value without including the tax and then we must choose which is taxable.
This does not happen with the prices of the products, even when the tax is defined, WC allows the value including the tax to be introduced.
It would help a lot to solve this, either with a hook from WCFM.
Allowing us to administer, show simple sales values, return the tax or the value of sending to the seller makes a service for all is really offered.
Regards,
JoseParticipantHi,
Thanks you so much !! work perfect !!
Best regards,
JoseParticipantHi,
Ok, I was sure that not affect because don’t are the same.
Please check my attach.
Regards,
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.JoseParticipantHi,
If you disable “Shipping Cost not for vendor“, then it means Admin will handle shipping. In that case vendor will not see shipping under order details.
It is true, but only for common cases, but there are different situations for different countries.
In my country the seller must make a ticket (external to the system) with the total costs (product + shipping) including taxes.
There is the case that between the administrator and the seller it is agreed to resolve the issue of shipments by the administrator (centralized system), but this does not allow the seller to evade their obligation to issue a ballot for the total costs.
This means that between the seller and the administrator must subsequently resolve the effects of this (in my case the tax included in the shipment I must return it to the seller)
Maybe the ideal would be that at least they tell us if it is possible that they consider it or rightly invite us to request a customization.
Regards,
JoseParticipantHi,
I’m trying to make the same but code don’t work.
Maybe changed it from february ?
Regards,
JoseParticipantResolved !!
Ok, was hard but I found how to customize the vendor order view.
But just need help with how to add tax from shipping cost to vendor. Because the first one that I made was activate tax in WC but is so confused, because show shipping cost not incluide tax.
So, exist some idea to resolve this one ?
Regards,
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.JoseParticipantUpdate !!
Hi, I found how to resolve to show the shipping address, it was necessary to disable each shipment of vendor per store.
But still, my request about the cost of shipping and the information of the total cost of the order is necessary for the vendor.
Best regards,
JoseParticipantHi,
I found that the same thing happens in the order view of the administrator, the shipping address is hidden.
To clarify my request, show the shipping address and shipping cost, including the grand total. The seller will be able to:
* With this he can check if there is any problem with the shipment and amount.
* Know the exact amount to make the invoice (in my country the invoice includes taxes, so it is not necessary to detail)In fact, the information held by the administrator could be the same as that of the seller.
Regards,
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.JoseParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.JoseParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.JoseParticipantHi,
I am having a critical situation with what they expose me.
Whether or not the seller receives the value of the shipment, it is crucial for us to show the value of the shipment and its tax. (To the seller)
1.- It is necessary to understand the fact that the seller’s tax is returned (if this option exists in your system it is because there is a situation that requires it)
2.- On the other hand, and on several occasions I have tried to express to them, the need for the seller to know the total value that the customer must pay. This is of vital importance since the invoice must be issued manually by the seller.Until a few months ago there was no comprehensive solution for shipping logistics in my country, so all the tests were performed with the option of sending the store. But now there is an external option.
This option consists of our contract with them, but like the ticket, for the total of the purchase (product and shipment), the seller issues it, I must necessarily return the shipping tax, in addition to the commission.I have always said that wcfm will be an excellent platform as long as they give the administration to make these decisions, hide or visualize certain aspects of the system.
I’m still in stand by my request to customize the email to customer with you, because I need to resolved this issue.
Best regards,
JoseParticipantUpdate after yours updates
You can see in the attachment that still diference of info between Admin and Vendor view orders.
For all example I set 90% vendor commission, Tax of 10% (the price of product we will add include tax) For shipping cost we add the price with taxable tax.
And in the commission setting we check Tax goes to vendor (from shipping)Regards,
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.JoseParticipantUpdate !
Hi, I found that issue are with SG Optimizer Plugin from Siteground, I changed hosting.
I will talk with them.
Regards,
JoseParticipantResolved !
Thanks so much.
JoseParticipantResolved !!
Thanks a lot
Regards,JoseParticipantResolved !
Hi,
I’m glad to know and that it served my report.
Regards,
JoseParticipantResolved !
Thanks so much !!
JoseParticipantOk, I understand.
Regards,
JoseParticipantHi,
Is it likely to be related to the other problem reported ?
The second page sould will be from 26 to 50 ?Regards,
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.JoseParticipantResolved !!
Work perfect, thanks so much.
Regards,
- AuthorPosts