Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- EKParticipant
Thanks a lot for taking care about this 🙂 Have a nice day ahead.
Thank you
EKParticipantHi,
After 4 months, the status of the published products can be forced to be made draft thus affecting the product limit? So, they will be forced to purchase the credit to upload or publish new products which includes making the draft products back to publish again?
good idea? 😉 If you want, I can give you a more specific answer based on which you can programme to make this into an extremely powerful feature 😉
In short,
1. Store product expiry date in a variable during purchase of product credit. (X= 4 months from date of purchase)
2. On vendor login, check X and if x >= date then select all products linked to x and run function to change status from published to draft
3. Check product credits and minus from product credits, the total number of products made into draft. (hence customer has to buy more next time they want to publish products-New or the ones made into draft).
4. Email vendor which products became draft with payment button.
Now this is my very short and over the top of my head. You get the idea 🙂 Ofcourse, you have to really think and plan this to make it into production unlike my simple 2 lines.
Thank you
September 18, 2019 at 4:38 pm in reply to: Avoid having to go through registration for existing member #82292EKParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.EKParticipantHi,
Do you have any update about this? We cannot invite members to join without the design being as per the brand requirements.
Thanks,
Team AKEKParticipantHi,
I analyzed how your plugin works. Basically, you share the same login page for all site members as used by woocommerce + wordpress. So, I re-designed the flow to adapt to your flow.
Can you just help me modify (See screenshot for graphical explanation)
1. The text that says login
2. The text that says register
3. The Text “become a vendor” text.
4. Can you kindly give the CSS selector to make the ‘become a vendor’ link into a button with my own css code. Is there a way by which I can attach a class/ID to the link so I can add custom CSS.This way, I can remove the confusion by telling all people what to expect when they use the register and login forms. Right now vendors use registration form to mistakenly register as site customers and leave confused.
If the above is possible, then you can ignore my previous request to hide the whole register form.
Thanks a lot,
AK
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.EKParticipantHi,
I need to hide the whole register section since that section is to register non-vendor role users. Your code just hides the ‘register as vendor’ link.
Is there any way a vendor can see a login form without any other registration form on the side which does not register the person as a vendor? Please see screenshot. I wrote in the screenshot what I want to hide. It is the register section.
Thank you.
Ak
EKParticipantThanks a ton Steve 🙂 Saved me a lot of time worrying about this after I noticed some attempts by spambots 🙂 Have a nice evening ahead 🙂
EKParticipantHey 🙂 thank you for the link. Can you confirm that you got this working specifically with the vendor registration form? 🙂 Thanks a ton for pitching in.
EKParticipantWe did some forum hunting and found that most people in the forum are requesting for the re-set feature we just posted about.
Think from a business point of view: If seller has high commission for low sales, he will put more effort to sell more to reach next lower commission slab? Without your reset setting, they will work to cross the slab only once in their lifetime and then be lazy (costing us bandwidth/space/server costs etc from dormant account).
On behalf of all your user base, commission by vendor sales without reset time definition is not possible to use meaningfully from a business point of view as explained above. Only very specific business models can use this setting meaningfully without worrying about reset.
Can you kindly let us know how to achieve the time frame reset ?
Thanks and cheers,
Ak
EKParticipantUp-vote for points 1 and 3 specially. Looks like you are from EU and know what is needed here 😉
All valid points and will make the plugin much more stronger. We follow.
September 11, 2019 at 3:56 pm in reply to: Membership subscription – payment mode WC Checkout #81183EKParticipantInteresting concept. We follow. 🙂
EKParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.EKParticipantThank you. This is resolved 🙂
Have a nice day ahead.
Best Regards,
AKSeptember 6, 2019 at 2:41 pm in reply to: Missing option about who gets shipping cost on a per product basis #80433EKParticipantHi,
Do you have any update about this? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Ak
September 4, 2019 at 12:37 pm in reply to: Missing option about who gets shipping cost on a per product basis #80037EKParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.September 4, 2019 at 11:13 am in reply to: Missing option about who gets shipping cost on a per product basis #80006EKParticipantHi,
Thank you for explaining. Can you kindly suggest your solution for the scenario:
1. Vendor sells own products as well as products allocated to vendor by admin (meaning shipping cost /tax should go to admin).
In my head, each vendor should have 2 accounts. One uniquely selling admin products and another selling own products. The question is, can same stripe account be used to create 2 accounts in the same site? (via stripe connect). Will your plugin be able to manage if same vendor uses same stripe for creating 2 vendor accounts? (Imagine same cart has products from his 2 separate accounts both connected to same stripe account).
Thanks for your advise and clarification.
Best Regards,
AKEKParticipantHi,
We all received emails from stripe informing us that our integration was not compliant with SCA and risks failed payments from Europe. Can you kindly confirm that you will update this by 14th of September.
This is important for ALL your clients since no payment from Europe or in Europe will be possible after 14th September unless your stripe gateway is compliant with SCA and I was surprised that stripe emailed us specifically to warn us today. We upvote this post as it is ultra important. We did not post before since we saw the previous post linked above where you had promised to update within 14th September.
Thanks a lot for keeping is updated about this 🙂 Have a nice week ahead.
Cheers,
AKEKParticipantThank you 🙂
Have a nice weekend.
Best regards,
Ak
EKParticipantAny update about this? Like Criag pointed out, sorting should be enabled on all relevant fields since vendors need the same easy in their work time. Eg: My vendor had to remove damaged products from his stock by SKU. Since this function is missing, he needed more than 1 hour to figure out just the list which he has to remove since he could not sort by SKU in which he had arranged his stock 😉
Thanks,
AK
April 1, 2019 at 1:15 pm in reply to: Refund amount not including shipping (order status is processing) #55587EKParticipantI guess there should be a mechanism to refund shipping fee separately? We are running staging tests but did not test refunds yet. Will check and let you know if we find anything 😉
Over the top of my head, can you change order status and re-test. Ofcourse, if refund is given before shipping, then customer needs full amount back.
Regards,
AkEKParticipantThank you. I will test this after migrating production to your plugin. I intend to migrate this week after fixing the stripe issue (we are in email regarding that).
I will try testing wp-fastest-cache in my staging server meanwhile 😉
Best Regards,
Ak
EKParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.EKParticipantDid you try un-checking some items in the screen option bar in the admin panel? 😉
This happens when you have a lot of data to display and there is not enough width. I disabled a few options which I did not need to enable good display.
The screen options tab can be found on the top right. Maybe this helps 😉
Btw, I am not from wclovers team.
Cheers,
AKEKParticipantThis reply has been marked as private.EKParticipantUpdate: I found a workaround: Delete test keys as admin and vendors get disconnected. However, kindly comment your thoughts since this is not the right way of disconnecting. I will update more test results relevant to this issue.
Thanks,
- AuthorPosts